Chromatography Research - Column Chromatography, Gas Chromatography (GC), Liquid Chromatograpy, HPLC

Chromatography Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Chromatography, including details on column chromatography, gas chromatography (gc), liquid chromatograpy, hplc.


Chromatography Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Chromatography

Books on Chromatography

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Comparison of electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure photoionization for coupling of micellar electrokinetic chromatography with ion trap mass spectrometry.

Hommerson P, Khan AM, de Jong GJ, Somsen GW

Department of Biomedical Analysis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. P.Hommerson@uu.nl

The performance of dopant-assisted atmospheric pressure photoionization (DA-APPI) and electrospray ionization (ESI) for the coupling of micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) with ion trap mass spectrometry (ITMS) was compared using a set of test drugs comprising basic amines, steroids, esters, phenones and a quaternary ammonium compound. The influence of the surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on analyte signals was studied by infusion of sample through the CE capillary into the respective ion sources. It was found that background electrolytes (BGEs) containing 20-50 mM SDS in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) caused major ionization suppression for both polar and apolar compounds in ESI-MS, whereas APPI-MS signal intensities remained largely unaffected. ESI gave rise to the formation of SDS clusters, which occasionally may cause space-charge effects in the ion trap. Furthermore, extensive sodium-adduct formation was observed for medium polar compounds with ESI-MS, whereas these compounds were detected as their protonated molecules with APPI-MS. Using the BGE containing 20 mM SDS, MEKC-ESI-MS still provides slightly lower limits of detection (LODs) (2.6-3.1 microM) than MEKC-APPI-MS (4.3-6.4 microM) for basic amines. For less polar compounds, highest S/Ns were obtained with APPI-MS detection (LODs, 4.5-71 microM). For BGEs containing 50 mM SDS, the limits of detection for MEKC-APPI-MS were more favorable (factor 1.5-12) than MEKC-ESI-MS for nearly all tested drugs. Spray shield contamination by SDS was lower in DA-APPI-MS than in ESI-MS. It is concluded that DA-APPI shows the most favorable characteristics for MEKC-MS, especially when compounds of low polarity have to be analyzed.

Published 1 September 2008 in J Chromatogr A, 1204(2): 197-203.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2009 Chromatography Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Chromatography Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2009)
  Issue 1 (January)



Chromatography Books

Columns for Gas Chromatography: Performance and Selection

Columns for Gas Chromatography: Performance and Selection